Customer account or finance
Before extending credit
Check the public record, identify what needs verifying, and set terms that fit the evidence before invoicing or increasing exposure.
RecoupIQ provides business intelligence from public UK records. Nothing here constitutes financial advice, a regulated credit assessment, or a regulated activity under FSMA 2000. Evidence indicators summarise available records and are not credit decisions. ICO ZC077511. Privacy · Terms · Corrections
This sample shows the practical result: public-record evidence organised into what to verify, what to discuss, and what to review before you rely on a company. It uses fictional data; a purchased report uses available Companies House and public-record evidence for the company you ask about.
The same company evidence can support different decisions. Start with the job in front of you, then choose the report depth that fits the exposure.
Customer account or finance
Check the public record, identify what needs verifying, and set terms that fit the evidence before invoicing or increasing exposure.
Procurement or operations
Confirm the legal entity and the questions to ask before committing spend. Related companies are discovery links, not supplier certification.
Director or portfolio owner
Create a shareable baseline, record the evidence date, and decide whether monitoring or deeper review is justified.
The free page gives the latest public record in one place. Paid depth adds structured evidence and a PDF that records what to verify before you commit exposure.
A quick first look
Latest Companies House identity and filing dates, available PSC and charge facts, period-labelled iXBRL figures, public notices, evidence posture, and coverage limits.
No PDF, no multi-period interpretation, and no guarantee of payment, solvency, or suitability.
One immediate commercial decision
A focused source-linked PDF with evidence, questions to verify, and terms to discuss.
Best when the decision is important but the exposure is still limited.
Material counterparty exposure
Adds director networks, connected-company patterns, charges, filed-account context, and sector comparison.
Coverage remains source-dependent and peer context is not a supplier certification.
Professional or complex review
Adds the fuller source-cited evidence bundle and working context for professional review.
It supports investigation and judgement; it is not legal advice.
The product map
The Summary is the short decision view. The Deep Report is the detailed audit. Monitoring is what continues after the one-off decision.
| Surface | Price | Use it for | What it adds | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free company page | Free | Understand the latest public record before deciding whether more checking is worthwhile | Latest identity and filing dates, available PSC and charge facts, period-labelled iXBRL figures, public notices, evidence posture, coverage limits, and clickable corporate-control links when present. | No PDF, no multi-period interpretation or full network analysis, and no payment or solvency guarantee. |
| Quick Check | £29.00 | Make one immediate commercial decision | Focused source-linked PDF with the available posture, priority evidence, verification questions, and terms to discuss. | The report is limited to evidence available for the requested company and is not a credit score. |
| Summary Report | Included | Give a director or manager the short decision view | Decision posture, up to three priority findings, financial direction where filed evidence exists, questions to verify, and the coverage boundary. | Included within the paid report flow. It is not a separate product or a replacement for the detailed evidence. |
| Deep Report | £167.00+ | Let a professional audit why the decision was reached | Detailed evidence register, director and connected-company context, charges, account context, sector peer context, methodology, and source trail where available. | Peer context is not supplier certification, and every module remains source-dependent. |
| Practitioner Pack | £687.00 | Review multiple cases or a complex professional matter | Deep evidence plus the professional working context and source-cited decision material for advisers and institutional reviewers. | It supports investigation and judgement. It is not legal advice or a regulated credit opinion. |
| Monitoring | £19.99/mo | Keep a relationship visible after the first decision | Saved company watchlist and public-record change alerts according to the selected monitoring plan. | Monitoring detects selected record changes. It does not guarantee that every commercial event is visible. |
Supplier alternatives
Range-based alternatives are a gated capability, not a guessed list. They can be shown when a verified supplier catalogue or buyer-provided range exists. Matching can then use range overlap, SIC, geography, size, and evidence coverage.
The current public-record data has no verified supplier range, capacity, availability, price, quality, or lead-time fields, so the free page and sample report do not publish supplier recommendations.
Put the check in context
Enter the exposure you are considering. The calculator shows the avoidable-loss threshold at which a £29.00 report would be economically justified. It does not predict a loss or guarantee an outcome.
Report price
£29.00
Effective exposure
£10,000.00
Break-even threshold
0.29%
of the effective exposure
Formula: report price / (exposure x affected share). The calculation supports a commercial conversation; it is not evidence that a loss will occur or be prevented.
A report should not leave you staring at a verdict. This sample shows how RecoupIQ turns available public-record findings into evidence, questions to verify, and terms to consider. The sample uses a fictional company; the real report uses available company data.
Confirm the current position, agree suitable terms, and set a review point before relying on the relationship.
One-off purchase, no subscription required. Delivered by email within minutes through secure checkout.
No. It reports available public evidence and the questions it creates. It is not a credit rating, probability of default, payment guarantee, or clearance decision.
Missing evidence is shown as a coverage boundary. It is not converted into a green result, and the report identifies what needs confirming elsewhere.
No. A relationship link is a discovery aid. A supplier alternative requires verified range, capacity, geography, lead time, and substitution evidence.
Yes. The report is structured around evidence, verification questions, and terms to discuss, so it can be shared with a director, finance lead, procurement owner, or adviser.
This is an informational public-record due diligence report. It is not a regulated credit rating, financial or legal advice, or a guarantee of payment, solvency, or performance.