RecoupIQ provides business intelligence from public UK records. Nothing here constitutes financial advice, a regulated credit assessment, or a regulated activity under FSMA 2000. Evidence indicators summarise available records and are not credit decisions. ICO ZC077511. Privacy · Terms · Corrections
"Clark Sinclair Limited took advantage of struggling businesses by offering directors a misleading route out of their company’s debts, charging thousands…
“Clark Sinclair Limited took advantage of struggling businesses by offering directors a misleading route out of their company’s debts, charging thousands of pounds for the service.” In its 4 November release, the Insolvency Service said the Manchester broker took at least £123,052, charged £2,500 to £6,800 per case, and was wound up by the High Court on 29 October 2026.
The Insolvency Service says Clark Sinclair Limited marketed £1 sales of distressed companies as a way for directors to avoid scrutiny before liquidation. Its emails also suggested directors could avoid reputational damage, and that sales could be completed within days.
The release says that was misleading. “Selling a company does not prevent its former directors’ conduct from being investigated if it later enters liquidation.” Investigators identified £123,052 in customer payments across two company accounts, and 51 companies that appeared to have changed ownership after paying Clark Sinclair.
Clark Sinclair Limited, company number 15324100, was incorporated on 3 December 2023 and wound up in the public interest under section 124A of the Insolvency Act
Review any debtor that changed ownership for £1, or for a nominal sum, shortly before insolvency pressure intensified.
Pull the company’s filing history and confirmation statements, then compare the timing of director and shareholder changes with unpaid invoices.
Check whether management told creditors a sale had removed director responsibility, or delayed payment because a new owner had taken over.
Preserve emails, engagement letters, and board papers if an adviser charged a broking fee of £2,500 to £6,800 for a pre-insolvency sale.
Treat a payment to a broker, or an ownership change alone, as a warning sign, not proof of wrongdoing.
For trade creditors, the point is simple. A fast pre-insolvency share sale does not clean the slate for former directors, and it should not stop you checking conduct, asset movements, and the sequence of control changes.
This case also shows why creditors should test the story around any rescue adviser. If the pitch is that a £1 sale avoids scrutiny, that is exactly the claim the Insolvency Service says was misleading here.
Verify next whether any debtor you are chasing had a nominal ownership transfer, adviser fee, or director change shortly before non-payment worsened.
Before you extend credit or release goods
Screen UK company solvency across 12 public sources in minutes and protect delivery margin before extending credit terms.
This article repeats facts from official UK public registers (Companies
House, The Gazette, HM Courts and Tribunals Service and the Insolvency
Service) as published on the date shown. RecoupIQ adds no inference or
allegation, and makes no assertion of insolvency, fraud, or wrongdoing
beyond what the official record states. It is not legal or financial
advice. Subjects may submit corrections or removal requests via
/legal/corrections.
Search the public record for any UK company: filings, directors, charges and insolvency notices.
Free search. No card required.
Need a written answer on one company? Quick Check, £29
