Executive overview
Eight director disqualifications published for 2 November 2026 are already live, with effective dates of 29 or 30 October 2026 and end dates stretching from 29 April 2030 to 29 October
- The average term is about 7.6 years. Seven cases are undertakings under section 7 of the CDDA 1986, while one is a section 6 court order, so the main exposure point for UK counterparties is immediate governance screening, not hindsight analysis.
What the source says
The eight live entries
In the Companies House Disqualified Officers Service, checked on 2 November 2026, Thamotharampillai Paran was disqualified for 11 years on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 October 2037, under CDDA 1986 section 7; Shaun Andrew Radcliffe was disqualified for 10 years on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 October 2036, under section 7; Saeed Norouzi was disqualified for 10 years on 29 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 28 October 2036, under section 7; and Anthony Dykes was disqualified for 9 years on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 October 2035, under section
The same Companies House Disqualified Officers Service shows Rahul Bains disqualified for 7 years on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 October 2033, under section 7; Sohail Ahmed Tahir Karim disqualified for 6 years on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 October 2032, under section 7; Gareth David Gwynne Davies disqualified for 4 years on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 October 2030, under CDDA 1986 section 6 by the Business and Property Court of England and Wales; and Morrice Diplexcito disqualified for 3 years and 6 months on 30 October 2026 per the Insolvency Service, to 29 April 2030, under section 7.
What this means for UK creditors
Exposure and prioritisation
For suppliers, lenders and trade creditors, this is a screening signal rather than proof of current loss exposure. The record establishes that eight named individuals are barred from acting in company management unless the court permits it, as set out in GOV.UK Insolvency Service guidance. That makes onboarding, credit-limit changes, payment-term extensions and mandate reviews the right priority today.
A useful second dimension is the route to enforcement. Seven bans were undertakings and one was a court order under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986. In practice, that distinction matters less to a creditor than the live restriction itself. The company-level evidence check can test whether any of these names appear in appointment histories or cross-directorship trails, which helps teams prioritise manual review without assuming that every name match shows a current management role.
The full article and company-level evidence check help you turn these eight live bans into a focused review of officer history, linked appointments and signing authority.
Next, verify whether any customer, supplier or borrower still shows one of these eight names in its director trail.
Before you extend credit or release goods
Check a client company against 12 public sources before you sign. Each finding links to its filing.
- 12 public sources and 10 compliance registers cross-checked with exact filing citations.
- One-off decision report from £29 with no annual subscription.
- Plain-English PDF delivered to your inbox in minutes.
This report is generated by the RecoupIQ News Engine based on algorithmic