RecoupIQ provides business intelligence from public UK records. Nothing here constitutes financial advice, a regulated credit assessment, or a regulated activity under FSMA 2000. Evidence indicators summarise available records and are not credit decisions. ICO ZC077511. Privacy · Terms · Corrections
As at 2 September 2026, RecoupIQ's weekly public-record join flagged 3,400,381 UK companies after filtering for apparent directors with 5 or more live…
If this article matters to your business, start with the free company check. If you need more detail, move straight into the paid checks without leaving the page.
As at 2 September 2026, RecoupIQ’s weekly public-record join flagged 3,400,381 UK companies after filtering for apparent directors with 5 or more live appointments and then running a name-match across Companies House live appointment records, the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), and the disqualified directors register. The same run produced 420,672 distinct matched register entries.
That is the surprise this week. Even with a filter that should narrow the field, the screen still reaches 3,400,381 companies. For UK creditors and procurement teams, the useful point is not that the signal proves anything about identity. It does not. The useful point is that the verification burden is much wider than many readers would expect from a 5-plus appointment screen. This is not a niche governance quirk. It is a large pool of apparent overlaps that merits checking when you are setting terms, onboarding a supplier, or reviewing an existing account.
The join is done on normalised name strings. Common names, repeated initials, and ordinary data noise can create coincidental overlaps, so each hit remains a name match until checked against the underlying public records. Verify via the source register and the relevant Companies House record before drawing conclusions. That boundary matters. The signal is an indicator, not a conclusion. What it says is that a company sits inside a screening pool where identity checks are worth doing. What it does not say is that any named individual has been identified with certainty.
First, review the matched entry on the UK Sanctions List or the disqualified directors register and note the public identifiers shown there. Second, cross-check those details against the company’s officer and PSC filings at Companies House, using the public record rather than a name alone. Third, call the company and ask for confirmation of the relevant director or PSC identity and role before you change terms, pause supply, or escalate internally. Used properly, that turns a blunt screen into a practical risk-control step. Used carelessly, it turns a name overlap into an unsupported conclusion. The difference is the company-level check.
RecoupIQ refreshes the join daily, normalises director and register names, and applies a rule-of-5 threshold so we do not publish counts below
